Trust Wallet Review: Is It Safe and Worth Using in 2025?

Last updated: Sep 11, 2025
27 Min Read
AI Generated Summary
Summary
Summary
Pros
Support for 10M+ crypto assets and 100+ blockchains
Built-in DeFi browser, swaps, staking, and DApp access
Staking support for 20+ coins with competitive yields
Simple setup and clean portfolio view for first-time users
Binance backing, which adds resources and visibility
Regular audits and ISO 27001/27701 certifications
Security Scanner that flags risky DApps and tokens
FlexGas lets you pay fees in TWT, USDT, or USDC
Cons
The vast selection of crypto assets may be overwhelming for some users
Reliance on third-party fiat providers adds costs and KYC friction
On-ramp fees are high unless you hold TWT or catch promos
Hardware wallet pairing is limited to Ledger via extension
Token metadata is inconsistent for niche or new assets

Choosing a crypto wallet is the foundation of how you’ll actually own your coins. There are plenty of solid routes you can take, but today we’re zeroing in on Trust Wallet, the mobile-first option that’s won fans for its clean interface and broad asset support.

Exchanges have tightened security since the big hack years, and the best of them carry insurance and robust controls. Still, nothing beats holding your own keys. For larger stacks, we usually point people toward hardware. For everyday balances, travel, and quick DeFi moves, a well-built software wallet on your phone can strike the right balance between convenience and control, and that’s the space Trust Wallet plays in.

In this review, we’ll put Trust Wallet under a bright light: what it is, how it works, and where it shines (or falls short). We'll assess its features, security design, supported networks, and the trade-offs you need to know. By the end, you’ll have a clear sense of whether Trust Wallet fits your use case, or if you’re better off with a different setup.

How We Rate Trust Wallet

4.6 / 5
★★★★★
Security
★★★★★
Asset Support
★★★★★
DeFi
★★★★★
App / UX
★★★★★
Support
★★★★★

Quick Verdict

Trust Wallet is a battle-tested, non-custodial wallet with support for over 10 million crypto assets and a polished mobile experience. It nails the basics, while giving power users built-in DeFi and NFT tools. It’s not a fiat on-ramp and it won’t hold your hand on seed-phrase security, but if you want full control without exchange risk, this is a top-tier pick.

Strengths

  • Supports 10M+ tokens across 100+ blockchains
  • Built-in staking, swaps, NFT gallery, and DeFi access
  • Smooth mobile UX, no swap markup

Weaknesses

  • The vast selection of crypto assets may be overwhelming for some users
  • Reliance on third-party fiat providers adds costs and KYC friction

Who it Suits

Mobile DeFi explorers, NFT users, and beginners who want a straightforward way to control assets without relying on an exchange.

Who Should Consider Alternatives

Institutions, desktop-heavy users, or anyone uncomfortable managing their own recovery phrase.

Trust Wallet Quick Facts

FeatureDetails
PlatformMobile app (iOS/Android) + Browser extension (Chrome, Brave, Edge, Opera)
Assets10 million+ crypto assets across 100+ blockchains
DeFiBuilt-in DApp browser, staking, swaps, NFT gallery
CostFree app; network and third-party provider fees apply
NotableAcquired by Binance in 2018, remains fully non-custodial
App ratingsiOS ★4.5/5; Android ★4.5/5

What Is Trust Wallet?

Trust Wallet has grown far beyond a simple storage app for Bitcoin or Ethereum. It is a self-custody, multi-chain wallet that doubles as a hub for DeFi and NFTs. Inside the app, users can connect to decentralized applications (DApps), trade or showcase NFTs, and even stake assets to earn yield, all without leaving the wallet. 

Since its launch as a lightweight Ethereum wallet in 2017, it has become a gateway to hundreds of blockchains. Supported by Binance's resources but remaining fully self-custodial, Trust Wallet strikes a balance between wide-ranging functionality and user control.

Background & Development

Viktor Radchenko founded Trust Wallet in 2017, initially as an ERC-20 token wallet designed for simplicity and ease of use. What made it stand out early was its clean interface, token auto-detection, and smooth onboarding for newcomers. 

As demand for multi-chain access grew, Trust Wallet quickly integrated support for major networks beyond Ethereum, including Bitcoin, Binance Smart Chain, and Solana. Over time, it added advanced features such as staking, token swaps, and NFT galleries.

This combination of ease of use and constant expansion set the foundation for its growth.

Binance Acquisition & Ecosystem Role

A year after it was founded, Trust Wallet was acquired by Binance in 2018. This was a major step towards its mobile presence and strengthening its ecosystem. The deal provided Trust Wallet with the resources and integrations of a top exchange, including fiat on-ramps and deeper DeFi access. 

Yet, the wallet preserved its central principle: “private keys remain in the user’s hands.” That approach gave Binance users a bridge into decentralized finance without compromising the independence of self-custody.

Platforms & Access

Today, Trust Wallet runs natively on iOS and Android, with a browser extension expanding its reach to desktop environments. While it doesn’t offer a dedicated desktop app, WalletConnect ensures smooth connectivity to DeFi protocols and DApps on larger screens. 

This cross-platform availability positions Trust Wallet as a practical option for both mobile-first users and those tapping into the desktop DeFi ecosystem.

Key Features of Trust Wallet

Key Features of Trust Wallet
Trust Wallet Is Your All-In-One Crypto Toolkit. Image via Trust Wallet

Trust Wallet markets itself as an “all-in-one” crypto app. Its feature list is comprehensive of the entire web3 services with large token support, DeFi integration, staking, and fiat gateways. 

Let’s break down the features that make it appealing.

1. Wide Cryptocurrency & NFT Support

Trust Wallet’s biggest selling point is coverage. It supports over 10 million crypto assets across more than 100 blockchains. Auto-detection enables most ERC-20 and BEP-20 tokens to appear instantly, while users can manually add custom tokens if needed. 

NFTs are fully integrated, with ERC-721 and ERC-1155 support plus a native gallery for BNB Chain and Ethereum collections. Updates for new chains arrive regularly, keeping the wallet competitive with MetaMask and Phantom.

2. DeFi & DApp Integration

Trust Wallet includes its own DApp browser on mobile and supports WalletConnect for external integrations. Users can interact with DEXs, L2 rollups, NFT marketplaces, and lending protocols directly from the app. 

Chain switching on the Trust wallet is smooth, permissions are transparent, and the built-in security scanner flags risky contracts and addresses. Gas controls and slippage settings are available, though there’s no native protection against MEV.

3. Staking & Earning

Staking is built in for more than 20 assets, including BNB, ATOM, SOL, DOT, and TRX. Yields vary widely: Cosmos often exceeds 16% APR, while others like BNB sit lower. Lock-up times and unbonding periods follow network rules (e.g., Cosmos ~21 days). 

Users take on slashing risk, unlike exchange-based staking, where the provider absorbs it. Beyond staking, Trust Wallet added LaunchPools and Stablecoin Earn options for yield, bringing it closer to being a full DeFi portfolio app.

4. In-App Buying, Swaps & Off-Ramps

Users can purchase crypto via Apple Pay, Google Pay, debit/credit cards, or third-party providers such as MoonPay and Binance Pay. Swap functionality is powered by integrated DEX aggregators, giving access to liquidity pools without leaving the wallet. 

While the app itself doesn’t charge a fee, network costs and provider spreads apply. Off-ramping isn’t fully built-in; you’ll usually need to send funds to a centralized exchange to cash out.

Security & Safety Deep Dive

Safety and Security Features of Trust Wallet

Here’s the thing: Trust Wallet puts keys on your device, adds in-app checks, and leans on audits. You get control and speed, but you also shoulder recovery and op-sec. Let’s go layer by layer with receipts.

Non-Custodial Model

Trust Wallet never holds your keys. Keys are generated and stored locally, encrypted, and guarded by a 12-word secret phrase that restores the wallet. Lose the phrase, and there is no platform recovery. This is the trade: full control and full responsibility. 

Backups

Back up the 12-word phrase offline. Use multiple copies in separate secure locations. Avoid screenshots and cloud drives unless encrypted. Trust’s support docs call the phrase the “master key” and warn that sharing it hands over your funds. Social engineering is the real risk vector. 

In-App Protections

Keys are AES-encrypted and kept in the device keystore. App lock, PIN, and biometrics add a gate. Trust pushes security alerts and runs a Security Scanner that scores transactions and flags risky dApps or addresses. You can also hide or report unsafe NFTs, and enable encrypted cloud backups if you choose.

Missing / Advanced Options

Native multisig is absent. There is no passphrase layer on top of the seed, and there is no email or ID account recovery. Hardware support exists via the browser extension with Ledger, which keeps keys on the device while you use Trust for UX. Trezor support is not advertised by Trust. 

Recovery is seed-only. So even the support team cannot restore accounts, reverse transactions, or unlock wallets. If a wallet is compromised, the official guidance is to create a fresh wallet, back it up, and migrate assets immediately.

Read: Is Trust Wallet Safe?

Trust Wallet's Safety vs Other Crypto Wallets

When assessing a wallet, comparisons highlight trade-offs. Trust Wallet is strongest on mobile multi-chain use, but the right choice depends on your needs.

FeatureTrust WalletMetaMaskCoinbase WalletHardware (Ledger/Trezor)
PlatformsMobile app, browser extensionBrowser extension, mobile appMobile app, browser extensionHardware device + companion app
Chains Supported100+ including BTC, Solana, BNBMainly Ethereum/EVM, plus manual addCoinbase-listed + Ethereum & EVMVaries—Ledger ~5,500, Trezor ~1,200
NFTs SupportedYes, with gallery UIYes, but more Ethereum-centricYes, limited to supported assetsDisplay via companion software
StakingBuilt-in for multiple assetsRecently added (e.g., Ethereum, Solana)Mostly via Coinbase platformNo built-in liquidity; external only
DApp BrowserBuilt-in mobile browserStrong browser supportBuilt-in on mobileNone; use software for interaction
Multisig SupportNoPossible via extensionsNoPossible via advanced hardware tools
Hardware PairingLedger via extension onlySupports Ledger, Trezor, more optionsLimited Ledger supportFull hardware isolation
On-Ramp OptionsThird-party with fee and KYCThird-party with fee and KYCBuilt-in fiat via CoinbaseRequires bridging through software
Typical CostsNetwork fees, swap slippage, ~1% unless TWT~0.875% swap + network feesHigher fiat fees with convenienceUp-front cost, near-zero transaction fees
Best ForMobile multi-chain users, NFTs, DeFi explorersEthereum dApp power usersFiat-to-crypto newcomers via CoinbaseLong-term holders needing max security

Quick takeaways from our comparison:  

  • Trust Wallet wins on native multi-chain and mobile UX. MetaMask dominates desktop and EVM DApps.
  • Coinbase Wallet ties neatly into exchange services. Trust Wallet is broader and leaner but lacks fiat depth.
  • Hardware is safer for long-term cold storage. Trust balances security with speed for daily on-chain activity.

User Experience & Interface

Now, let’s move on to how Trust Wallet actually feels in your hand. It’s designed for mobile ease, deep chain access, and fast DeFi moves. Below are its UX layers.

Mobile-First Design

Trust Wallet greets you with a clean setup flow. You choose between creating or importing a wallet, set a PIN or biometric protection, and land on a screen showing your chain balances across assets. It auto-discovers tokens as you send them and displays them in a unified portfolio view. 

Mobile UX of Trust Wallet\
UX Of Trust Wallet Gives Simple Design and Smooth Mobile Experience. Image via Trust Wallet Blog 

The transaction flow in the wallet is clearly pretty intuitive. 

  1. Tap “Send” or “Receive,” 
  2. Choose your coin, 
  3. Confirm via PIN/biometric, 
  4. And it’s on-chain. 

Approvals pop up with clear permission info. Bridge flows follow the same path but may switch RPCs automatically if needed.

Performance & Reliability

Trust Wallet remains stable across most devices. APIs and RPCs are generally responsive, but reliability varies by chain. Popular chains like Ethereum, BNB, and Solana load quickly while lesser-known networks sometimes lag or return stale token metadata. 

Token icons and names display accurately in most cases, but unfamiliar tokens may lack details until they are added manually. Overall, transitions are smooth, and with cold restarts, one can rebuild the portfolio quickly

Real User Feedback

App stores highlight what users love and what they don’t. We dug a bit deeper and found some honest reviews for you.

Google Play

Users praise quick setup and broad multi-chain self-custody, but many hit friction with third-party fiat on/off-ramps, perceived high swap/gas costs, inconsistent Earn/Staking displays, scam exposure via external DApps, minor bugs, and mixed support.

  • Positives

    Quick setup for basic send/receive, broad multi-chain support, and straightforward self-custody praised by many reviewers.

  • On/Off-Ramp Friction

    Buying/selling often routes via partners (e.g., MoonPay/Coinbase Pay). Users cite card/bank failures, refund loops, regional limits, and higher all-in costs than exchanges for small tickets.

  • Fees Perception

    Complaints about “high” swap/bridge costs; frequently resulting from a mix of service spreads and network gas. Small trades can feel uneconomical; isolated reports of extreme percentages on tiny amounts.

  • Earn/Staking Visibility

    Reports of rewards/balances not showing or temporarily reading “zero” (e.g., DOT unbonding waits, Aave v3/Stablecoin Earn screens). Some say support acknowledged issues; others waited for app updates to restore displays.

  • Scam/DApp Risk

    Losses often tied to malicious third-party DApps or approvals. Users warn that on-chain transfers are irreversible; some blame the app when funds were drained via external contracts or social engineering.

  • Bugs & UX Nits

    Token/price display glitches, delayed portfolio updates, push notifications not firing, network-specific hurdles (e.g., TRON fees), Hyperliquid connect errors, and occasional FlexGas/history display fixes mentioned.

  • Support

    Mixed sentiment: confirmations and help-center links for some; others report difficulty reaching responsive, case-specific assistance.

  • Crowd Split

    Many one-word 5★ (“good,” “best”) alongside sharp 1★ alleging scams or stuck funds, suggesting a steep learning curve and more friction on advanced actions.

  • Bottom Line

    Solid for self-custody and Web3 access if you understand networks, gas, and approvals. Not ideal as a primary fiat on/off-ramp; Earn/staking views can be inconsistent. Newcomers should proceed carefully and double-check DApps.

Apple App Store

Users liked the straightforward self-custody, yet reviews flag third-party purchase hurdles, confusion over required gas tokens, occasional migration/recovery snags, scam exposure via external DApps and mixed support.

  • Positives

    Simple iOS setup for holding and transferring assets; long-time users highlight straightforward self-custody once network fees and gas are understood.

  • On/Off-Ramp Friction

    Purchases route via third-party providers (e.g., MoonPay/Simplex). Users report minimum purchase amounts, delays, refunds, and needing to contact the provider directly.

  • Gas & Network Requirements

    Frequent confusion about needing native gas tokens (e.g., BNB/ETH) to swap or move assets; some complain the app doesn’t let them buy just a tiny amount of gas when short.

  • Scam/DApp Risk

    Multiple accounts of scams outside the app (fake “unfreeze” deposits, romance/investment schemes) surfaced in reviews; developer replies repeatedly warn against engaging with such demands and direct users to official support.

  • Token Migrations & Recovery

    Reports of missed migrations or recovery flows requiring gas; some users interpret these on-chain requirements as app issues.

  • Support

    Mixed sentiment: developer responses link to help resources and stress third-party flows; reviewers still cite ticket loops or slow case-specific follow-ups.

  • Crowd Split

    Polarized feedback—some satisfied long-term holders vs. frustrated newcomers encountering gas, provider minimums/delays, and scam exposure via external DApps.

  • Bottom Line

    Useful as a self-custody iOS wallet if you understand networks, gas, and contract approvals. It’s not a full-service brokerage: fiat purchases rely on third parties, and on-chain transfers are irreversible. Always verify DApps and follow official support links.

Fees & Total Cost of Ownership

Fees and TCO
Fees And Total Ownership Include Hidden Costs Users Should Know. Image via Shutterstock

Fees are more than just gas; they cover network costs, swap spreads, fiat on-ramps, and indirect costs like failed transactions or slippage. And so what helps you understand your total cost and gives you an honest answer is the total cost of ownership (TCO), which helps you see the real cost of using Trust Wallet compared to peers.

What’s Free vs. Paid

The app download and setup of the wallet are completely free.

However, what's paid is:

  • Network gas on every transaction.
  • Swap slippage or spreads.
  • On-ramp partner fees (with optional 1% Trust Wallet surcharge).
  • FX conversion if buying in local currency.

Trust Wallet itself never charges direct fees for transfers. Only blockchain validators and third-party partners earn from your activity.

Network Fees

  • Bitcoin (BTC): Fee based on transaction size (sats/byte). Higher during congestion.
  • Ethereum (L1): Gas fluctuates widely, especially during NFT drops or high DeFi activity.
  • Ethereum L2 (Arbitrum/Optimism): Cents per transaction, far cheaper than L1.
  • BNB Chain: ~0.000063 BNB per simple transfer (≈ $0.03).
    Polygon (MATIC): Fractions of a cent to a few cents per transfer.

Trust Wallet allows users to adjust fees manually and recommends timing transactions during quieter network periods.

Swap & On-Ramp Fees

  • Swaps: No Trust-imposed fee, but partner spreads and slippage apply. Slippage can increase costs during volatile markets.
  • Fees & Total Cost of Ownership: 3.5–5%.
  • Trust Wallet adds 1% unless you hold ≥ 100 TWT tokens.
  • FX fees may apply if paying in local currency.
  • Promotions: MoonPay offered 0% fee on the first five purchases via the extension in 2023; Ramp gave one free transaction the same year.
  • FlexGas: You can now pay for gas with TWT, USDT, or USDC, reducing failure risk if you lack native chain tokens.

Competitor Cost Snapshot

WalletSwap FeeOn-Ramp FeesHidden/Other CostsNotes
Trust WalletNone (slippage applies)3.5–5% partner + 1% (waivable with ≥100 TWT)FX conversion; slippage; partner spreadsFlexGas support; periodic fee-waiver promotions
MetaMask~0.875% per swap + gas3–5% partner (varies)Slippage; higher swap markupWell integrated with desktop, but pricier for frequent swaps
Coinbase WalletNone on DEX swaps; gas onlyFiat ramps via Coinbase, often higher (up to 3.99% card buys)Exchange withdrawal feesSeamless fiat-to-crypto but centralized dependencies


Trust Wallet is the cheapest for swaps (no fee markup), but on-ramps can be costly unless you hold TWT or use promotions. MetaMask bakes in a swap fee, making heavy DeFi use pricier. Coinbase Wallet simplifies fiat flows but charges more for that convenience.

Comparison With Other Wallets 

Comparision of Trust Wallet And Other Wallets
 How Trust Stacks Up In Comparison With Other Wallets. Image via Shutterstock

Well, that was quite the list, right? But we know how important it is for you to look at other options before deciding. So we have compared Trust Wallet with the different options from the industry, which are famous for different reasons.

This will help you get an overview of where Trust Wallet stands in the industry.

FeatureTrust WalletMetaMaskCoinbase WalletHardware (Ledger/Trezor)
PlatformsMobile app, browser extensionBrowser extension, mobile appMobile app, browser extensionHardware device + companion app
Chains Supported100+ including BTC, Solana, BNBMainly Ethereum/EVM, plus manual addCoinbase-listed + Ethereum & EVMVaries
NFTs SupportedYes, with gallery UIYes, but more Ethereum-centricYes, limited to supported assetsDisplay via companion software
StakingBuilt-in for multiple assetsRecently added (e.g., Ethereum, Solana)Mostly via Coinbase platformNo built-in liquidity; external only
DApp BrowserBuilt-in mobile browserStrong browser supportBuilt-in on mobileNone; use software for interaction
Multisig SupportNoPossible via extensionsNoPossible via advanced hardware tools
Hardware PairingLedger via extension onlySupports Ledger, Trezor, more optionsLimited Ledger supportFull hardware isolation
On-Ramp OptionsThird-party with fee and KYCThird-party with fee and KYCBuilt-in fiat via CoinbaseRequires bridging through software
Typical CostsNetwork fees, swap slippage, ~1% unless TWT~0.875% swap + network feesHigher fiat fees with convenienceUp-front cost, near-zero transaction fees
Best ForMobile multi-chain users, NFTs, DeFi explorersEthereum dApp power usersFiat-to-crypto newcomers via CoinbaseLong-term holders needing max security

Trust Wallet vs MetaMask

Metamask, the choice of 100+million users, comes with a browser-first setup and is one of the toughest competitors of Trust Wallet.

  • Mobile-first vs. browser-first: Trust Wallet was built as a mobile app from the ground up. Its browser extension came later, but complements the phone experience. MetaMask started as a browser extension, becoming the de facto gateway to Ethereum dApps on desktop before rolling out a mobile app.
  • Default networks: Trust Wallet ships with support for 100+ chains, including non-EVM ones like Bitcoin, Solana, and Cosmos. MetaMask defaults to Ethereum Mainnet and testnets. To use other networks, you need to add them manually through RPC settings.
  • Token detection: Trust Wallet auto-detects ERC-20s, BEP-20s, and most standard tokens, displaying them without manual entry. MetaMask requires contract addresses for many tokens, though EVM compatibility ensures you can add them once you have details.
  • NFT handling: Trust Wallet integrates NFTs into a gallery view, supporting ERC-721 and ERC-1155 across Ethereum and BNB Chain. MetaMask supports NFTs too, but the UX is simpler; tokens appear as a list, and metadata sometimes fails to load without third-party connectors.
  • DApp UX: Trust Wallet includes an in-app dApp browser and WalletConnect integration. You can open a DeFi app, connect, and transact without leaving the wallet. MetaMask’s extension dominates desktop DeFi—most Web3 sites are built with it in mind. On mobile, it works, but Trust Wallet’s integrated browser feels smoother.
  • Swap fees/providers: Trust Wallet doesn’t impose its own swap fee. You pay network gas plus whatever spread comes from third-party liquidity sources. MetaMask charges ~0.875% swap fee on top of gas, routing through its aggregator. That makes Trust cheaper for frequent in-app swaps, though both rely on partner liquidity.

Trust Wallet vs Coinbase Wallet (Base App)

Highly connected with the centralised exchange, the Coinbase wallet is one of the most regulated and trusted wallets in the industry.

  • CEX tie-ins & on-ramp UX: Coinbase Wallet is self-custody, but tightly connected to Coinbase’s exchange. You can move fiat into crypto and back with minimal friction. Trust Wallet relies on third-party on-ramps like MoonPay or Simplex, which means higher fees and more KYC friction.
  • Asset breadth: Trust Wallet covers over 10 million tokens across 100+ chains, from major L1s to niche ecosystems. Coinbase Wallet covers Ethereum, EVM chains, and assets listed or supported by Coinbase’s infrastructure. For sheer breadth, Trust wins.
  • Fees: Coinbase Wallet transactions use network gas and carry Coinbase’s fiat ramp fees (often 3.5–4%). Trust Wallet charges no wallet fee, but its on-ramps levy 3.5–5%, plus an extra 1% unless you hold 100+ TWT. Coinbase’s fees are more predictable, while Trust’s vary by partner.
  • Support: Coinbase Wallet benefits from Coinbase’s customer support system, with help tickets and exchange-style resolution paths. Trust Wallet, being non-custodial, has limited support, mostly knowledge base articles and community forums.
  • Region coverage: Coinbase Wallet’s fiat integration is restricted to regions where Coinbase operates. Trust Wallet’s third-party on-ramps give it a broader global reach, though some providers may not serve certain jurisdictions.

Trust Wallet vs Hardware Wallets (Ledger/Trezor)

Security is a dealbreaker for everyone, so creating an account in any wallet without looking at the method of storage is risky. 

  • Hot vs. cold storage: Trust Wallet is a hot wallet. Keys live on your device, protected by encryption and biometrics, but always potentially exposed to online threats. Hardware wallets like Ledger and Trezor store keys offline, signing transactions in isolation. This makes them much safer against phishing or malware.

Read: Best Hardware Wallets

  • Who should upgrade: If you’re holding small to medium amounts or trading frequently, Trust Wallet is enough. If you’re storing significant long-term holdings of five figures or more, then a hardware wallet is strongly recommended. Many users run both: a hardware vault for savings, and Trust Wallet as the daily driver.
  • Pairing options: Trust Wallet currently supports Ledger pairing via its browser extension. This gives you the UX of Trust, but the private key safety of a hardware device. Trezor is not supported. MetaMask, by comparison, supports both Ledger and Trezor.
  • Daily driver + vault setup: A common workflow is to keep a Ledger for vault storage, use Trust Wallet for everyday DeFi or NFT interaction, and move funds between the two when needed. This splits risk: hardware guards your reserves, Trust Wallet handles active dApp use.

Read: Best Trust Wallet Alternatives

Who Should Use Trust Wallet in 2025?

Trust Wallet is built for people who want crypto in their pocket, not in a clunky desktop program. If you live on your phone, dip into DeFi protocols, or like browsing NFT markets without extra steps, this wallet hits the sweet spot. It’s also a strong entry point for learners who want self-custody without wrestling with technical setups.

That said, it’s not for everyone. Institutions and teams needing multisig or shared access will find it limiting. If the idea of storing a seed phrase makes you anxious, a custodial wallet may feel safer. And if you spend most of your time on a desktop, MetaMask or hardware-first setups will serve you better.

The bottom line: Trust Wallet is a dependable, everyday self-custody wallet with broad Web3 reach. Use it for active trading, staking, or NFT exploration. For serious long-term holdings, pair it with a hardware wallet, let Trust handle your day-to-day, and let Ledger or Trezor guard your vault.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Trust Wallet really be trusted?

Trust Wallet is owned by Binance, one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. The code is entirely open-source, so those developers, security experts, or anyone else who might be interested in poking about under the hood are free to do so if they wish.

Can Trust Wallet be hacked if someone gets my phone?

If your phone is unlocked, an attacker could access your wallet, but they still can’t move funds without the recovery phrase or private keys. Always use device-level security (PIN, biometrics) and enable extra measures like app lock. If you suspect compromise, transfer funds to a fresh wallet immediately.

Is Trust Wallet safe?

Trust Wallet focuses on user privacy and security. It doesn’t ask for any KYC when setting up a new account and, as a non-custodial wallet, does not store any user data. It also allows users to store their private keys locally on their devices rather than on Trust Wallet’s own servers.

While there is no two-factor authentication feature on the app yet, users can secure the app by enabling a fingerprint or pattern lock through the settings menu. However, as with all wallets, if you lose your private keys or recovery phrase, you will be unable to recover or gain access to your wallet. So, keep that in mind.

What are Trust Wallet fees?

Technically speaking, Trust Wallet is completely free to use and has zero fees. The only costs incurred are gas fees for processing transactions: these are paid either to miners or to those proof-of-stake chains that charge them.

Who Owns Trust Wallet?

Binance owns Trust Wallet. The acquisition was completed in July 2018, with the aim of providing better service and enhancing safety for its users. The founder of Trust Wallet is Viktor Radchenko, who established the wallet in November 2017

Can I connect Trust Wallet to a hardware wallet for extra security?

At present, Trust Wallet only supports Ledger hardware wallet integration through its browser extension, not the mobile app. Mobile-first users still rely on device security, but pairing with Ledger via extension adds an extra protection layer for desktop activity.

How does staking on Trust Wallet compare to exchange-based staking?

Staking via Trust Wallet gives you direct control over your tokens since they never leave your wallet. Returns (APY) vary by chain and validator, often slightly lower than exchange platforms, but you avoid custodial risks tied to centralized services.

Does Trust Wallet support NFTs/Web3 gaming tokens and which chains?

Yes, Trust Wallet supports NFTs and gaming tokens across major chains like Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Solana. Users can view, trade, or interact with dApps directly through its built-in NFT gallery and dApp browser.

Bio.jpg

Adept at leading editorial teams and executing SEO-driven content strategies, Devansh Juneja is an accomplished content writer with over three years of experience in Web3 journalism and technical writing. 

His expertise spans blockchain concepts, including Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Bitcoin Ordinals. Along with his strong finance and accounting background from ACCA affiliation, he has honed the art of storytelling and industry knowledge at the intersection of fintech.

Disclaimer: These are the writer’s opinions and should not be considered investment advice. Readers should do their own research.

Previous article
BTCC Exchange 2025 Review: An In-Depth Analysis!
next article
Ledger's Clear Signing Initiative: Eliminating Blind Signing Risks